|
TMS is effective and safe in around 50% of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who have not responded sufficiently to psychotherapy or medication. In contrast to conventional treatments, TMS allows for direct and adjustable modulation of dysregulated brain circuits involved in psychiatric symptoms.
TMS of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates brain networks underlying negative mood in MDD, while TMS of the medial prefrontal or orbitofrontal cortex influences networks involved in reward processing and behavioral flexibility relevant for OCD.
Siddiqui noted that “TMS is not a ‘treatment’—it’s a tool that’s used to deliver treatment,” with different TMS targets and protocols approved for different conditions: major depressive episodes (since 2008), migraine with aura (since 2013), OCD (since 2018), and nicotine use disorder (since August 2020).
High-frequency (10 to 20 Hz) TMS is the conventional protocol with strongest evidence, while intermittent theta burst (iTBS), a form of repetitive stimulation, may be more efficient. One Hz is sometimes used in patients with high seizure risk.
Siddiqui added that TMS should not be regarded as “ECT lite.” It has a targeted mechanism of action, whereas ECT is more diffuse. “TMS is usually more tolerable and logistically feasible,” he said. “If I were admitted to your inpatient unit severely suicidal, give me ECT. But in any other circumstance, ECT is quite disruptive.” ■
(Image: Getty Images/iStock/ipopba)
|